Textuality and Intertextuality in Contemporary Qur’anic Exegesis: A Comparative Study of Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd and Angelika Neuwirth

Authors

  • Fina Faizah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Naufal Hakim Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Abd. Kholid Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37812/fikroh.v19i3.2513

Keywords:

Contemporary exegesis, Quranic textuality, Quranic intertextuality, Nasr Hāmid Abū Zayd, Angelika Neuwirth

Abstract

Contemporary Qur’anic scholarship has developed influential accounts of textuality and intertextuality, yet the studies reviewed here usually examine these approaches separately. Their different treatments of textual coherence, historical communication, and present-day relevance require a comparison that specifies how methodological integration could work. This study compares Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd and Angelika Neuwirth to formulate a conceptual framework for contemporary Qur’anic interpretation. A qualitative literature study uses a history-of-ideas perspective and structured comparative analysis. Primary writings and selected secondary studies are examined through five indicators: textual concepts, historical context, interpretive units, intertextual relations, and contemporary contextualization. A shared Maryam passage illustrates the proposed sequence. The comparison identifies a shared commitment to historically situated language but different explanatory priorities. Abu Zayd distinguishes historical meaning from renewed significance, whereas Neuwirth connects surah composition, oral communication, and late antique interlocutors. These are overlapping emphases rather than mutually exclusive methods. Their integration requires linguistic and surah analysis, historically controlled comparison with related texts, and an explicit justification of contemporary significance. The contribution is a staged framework that distinguishes textual evidence, historical hypotheses, and normative inference. Its Maryam illustration clarifies the procedure without validating a complete exegetical model; systematic application to further passages remains necessary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

‘Abduh, M., & Riḍā, M. R. (1947). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Ḥakīm (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Dār al-Manār.

Abū Zayd, N. Ḥ. (1994). Naqd al-Khiṭāb al-Dīnī. Sīnā li al-Nashr.

Ahmad, H. P. (2025). Thematic and structural unity of Q 79 (al-Nazi’at): An intratextual and intertextual analysis. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 4(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.6698

Alfitri. (2002). Studi Quran kontemporer: Telaah atas hermeneuitik Quran Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 2(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol2.iss1.art4

Billa, M. (2012). Qirâ’ah siyâqîyah Nasr Hâmid Abû Zayd tentang hak-hak wanita dalam al-Qur’an. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 2(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2012.2.2.179-193

Dozan, W. (2017). Metodologi tafsir kontemporer: Aplikasi teori hermeneutika Nashr Hamid Abu Zaid Q.S. An-Nisa: 3. Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies, 6(2), 42–68. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v6i2.13411

El-Refaee, E. (2024). Islam and women’s rights: Abu Zayd’s hermeneutical reading of the Quran. Rowaq Arabi, 29(1), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.53833/QORY7955

Fikriyati, U. (2015). Angelika Neuwirth dan pembacaan al-Qur’an pre-canonical berbasis surat dan intertekstualitas. Nur El-Islam, 2(2), 116–135.

Fina, L. I. N. (2014). Membaca metode penafsiran al-Qur’an kontemporer di kalangan sarjana Barat: Analisis pemikiran Angelika Neuwirth. Ulumuna, 18(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v18i2.854

Fina, L. I. N. (2016). Catatan kritis Angelika Neuwirth terhadap kesarjanaan Barat dan Muslim atas Alquran: Menuju tawaran pembacaan Alquran pra-kanonisasi. Nun: Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Tafsir Di Nusantara, 2(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.32459/nun.v2i1.3

Garwan, M. S. (2020). Relasi teori double movement dengan kaidah al-Ibrah bi Umumil-Lafdz la bi Khusus as-Sabab dalam interpretasi QS. al-Ahzab [33]: 36–38. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 28(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v28i1.8103

Hakim, M. N. (2022). Ta’wîl tafsir periode modern: Telaah tafsir al-Marâghî karya Ahmad Musthâfâ. Al-Fath, 15(2), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.32678/alfath.v15i2.5275

Hakim, M. N. (2023a). Moderatisme pada tafsir al-Qur’an: Studi atas al-Tafsīr al-Munīr karya Wahbah al-Zuḥailī [Thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya]. http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/66239/

Hakim, M. N. (2023b). Moderatisme tafsir al-Qur’an: Konsiliasi pendekatan tradisional dan modern Wahbah al-Zuḥailī dalam al-Tafsīr al-Munīr. Pena Persada.

Hakim, M. N., & Kholid, A. (2022). Reposisi dialektis tafsīr lughawī: Pergeseran integratif pendekatan linguistik dalam wacana tafsir kontemporer. QOF: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 6(2), 233–254. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v6i2.275

Ichwan, M. N. (2003). Meretas kesarjanaan kritis al-Qur’an: Teori hermeneutika Nashr Hamid Abu Zayd. Teraju.

Jansen, J. J. G. (1997). Diskursus tafsir al-Quran modern. Tiara Wacana Yogya.

Kholid, A. (2014). Pemikiran Nasr Hâmid Abû Zayd tentang fiqh al-ta’wîl wa al-tafsîr. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 4(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2014.4.1.34-52

Kurzman, C. (Ed.). (1998). Liberal Islam: A source book. Oxford University Press.

Latief, H. (2003). Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid: Kritik teks keagamaan. Elsaq Press.

López-Farjeat, L. X. (2024). Naṣr Ḥāmid Abū Zayd’s use of classical theological and philosophical Islamic sources in his Qurʾānic hermeneutics. Filozofia, 79(8), 892–906. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.8.4

Lutfi, M. (2018). Hermeneutika al-Qur’an: Model interpretasi Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 8(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2018.8.1.22-45

Makin, A., Rafiq, A., Masrur, A., Mustaqim, A., Mansur, M., Arif, M., Syamsuddin, S., Ichwan, M. N., Ghofur, W. A., Baidhawy, Z., & Suryadilaga, M. A. (2002). Studi al-Qur’an kontemporer: Wacana baru berbagai metodologi tafsir. PT. Tiara Wacana Yogya.

Mawardi. (2018). Subjektivitas dalam penafsiran al-Quran: Fenomena tafsir bercorak sektarian. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir, 3(1), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v3i1.483

Moch, M. (2022). Critique of nasḫ in contemporary Qur’ānic hermeneutics using the example of Naṣr Ḥāmid Abū Zayd’s works. Religions, 13(2), Article 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020187

Mustaqim, A. (2010). Epistemologi tafsir kontemporer. LKiS.

Mustaqim, A. (2014). Metode penelitian al-Qur’an dan tafsir. Idea Press.

Neuwirth, A. (2003). Qur’an and history—A disputed relationship: Some reflections on Qur’anic history and history in the Qur’an. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2003.5.1.1

Neuwirth, A. (2010). Two faces of the Qur’ān: Qur’ān and Muṣḥaf. Oral Tradition, 25(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1353/ort.2010.a402427

Quran English translation: Clear, pure, easy to read modern English. (2015). ClearQuran.com. https://clearquran.com/004.html

Ridwan, M. K. (2016). Metodologi penafsiran kontekstual: Analisis gagasan dan prinsip kunci penafsiran kontekstual Abdullah Saeed. Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18326/mlt.v1i1.1-22

Rosa, A. (2015). Tafsir kontemporer: Metode dan orientasi modern dari para ahli dalam menafsirkan ayat al-Qur’an (2nd ed.). Depdikbud BantenPress.

Saeed, A. (2014). Reading the Qur’an in the twenty-first century: A contextualist approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870922

Setiawan, M. N. K. (2006). Al-Qur’an kitab sastra terbesar. Elsaq Press.

Syamsuddin, S. (2020). Metode penafsiran dengan pendekatan ma‘nā-cum-maghzā. In S. Syamsuddin (Ed.), Pendekatan ma‘nā-cum-maghzā atas al-Qur’an dan hadis: Menjawab problematika sosial keagamaan di era kontemporer (pp. 1–18). Lembaga Ladang Kata & Asosiasi Ilmu Alquran & Tafsir se-Indonesia. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/file/1022751

Zayd, A. (2003). Menalar firman Tuhan: Wacana majas dalam al-Qur’an menurut Mu’tazilah. Mizan.

Zubaidi, S., Asnawi, A. R., Kuswaya, A., Bandiyah, S. U., & Ridwan, M. K. (2025). Late Antiquity revisited: Angelika Neuwirth’s view on the story of Prophet Abraham. Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 20(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol20no1.5

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27

How to Cite

Faizah, Fina, Muhammad Naufal Hakim, and Abd. Kholid. 2026. “Textuality and Intertextuality in Contemporary Qur’anic Exegesis: A Comparative Study of Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd and Angelika Neuwirth”. Fikroh: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam 19 (3): 627-39. https://doi.org/10.37812/fikroh.v19i3.2513.