Understanding The Cosmological and Teleological Arguments For God's Existence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37812/josse.v4i1.1857Keywords:
Cosmological Argument; Teleological Argument; God's Existence; Complexity Argument; Substantial ArgumentAbstract
The teleological and cosmological reasons for God's existence are thoroughly explained in this research. The fact of God, a necessary and causeless being, is implied by the cosmological argument, which holds that the cosmos must have a purpose. The teleological argument contends that the order and complexity of the natural world prove the presence of an intelligent designer, usually called God. This work examines the historical development of these arguments and the contributions of prominent intellectuals like Thomas Aquinas, William Paley, and Immanuel Kant. A fair assessment of its philosophical implications and empirical usefulness is conducted by weighing the strengths and weaknesses of every argument. Moreover, among the objections made against these assertions are the scientific bases for the Big Bang theory and evolution. The paper concludes that while these arguments do not offer irrefutable proof of God’s existence, they significantly enhance the plausibility of theism, especially within the framework of natural theology. It calls for continued reflection rooted in critical thought and openness in exploring metaphysical questions.
References
Adeoye, M. A. (2024). Divine Nature under Scrutiny: Rethinking the Problem of Evil in the Light of Modern Philosophical Discourse. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 28(2), 543-557. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-2-543-557
Almeida, M. (2018). Cosmological arguments. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108675604
Anderson, M. J., & Stephenson, K. F. (2014). Aristotle: Genius Philosopher and Scientist. Enslow Publishing, LLC.
Aquinas, S. T. (2015). Of God and his creatures. Aeterna Press.
Aquinas, T. (2017). The Cosmological Argument. Readings in the Philosophy of Religion, 22.
Beckman, E. (2008). Richard Swinburne's Inductive Argument for the Existence of God – A Critical Analysis. Bachelor Dissertation, Department of Culture and Communication (IKK) Philosophy, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Linköping University
Beebee, H. (2006). Hume on causation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966600
Bell, M. (2011). Hume on the Nature and Existence of God. A Companion to Hume, 338–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696583.ch18
Bex, F. J. (2011). Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: A formal hybrid theory (Vol. 92). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0140-3
Blyth, D. (2015). Heavenly soul in Aristotle. Apeiron, 48(4), 427-465.
Bodnar, I., & Pellegrin, P. (2006). Aristotle’s Physics and Cosmology. A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, 270-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631210610.2006.00020.x
Botteri, G., & Casazza, R. (2023). The Astronomical System of Aristotle: An Interpretation (Vol. 58). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004525535
Bouchard, F. (2013). How ecosystem evolution strengthens the case for functional pluralism. Functions: Selection and mechanisms, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5304-4_5
Buckle, S. (2004). Hume's enlightenment tract: the unity and purpose of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press, USA. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271146.001.0001
Burrell, D. B. (2016). Aquinas: God and action. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Butler, J. (2001). Giving an account of oneself. Diacritics, 31(4), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2004.0002
Cantens, B. (2012). Suárez’s cosmological argument for the existence of God. Interpreting Suárez. Critical Essays, 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139018753.005
Capehart, J. D. (2021, June). Étienne Gilson: Three Stages and Two Modes of His Christian Philosophy. In Forum Philosophicum 26(1), 51–84. https://doi.org/10.35765/forphil.2021.2601.05
Cho, H. J. (2009). A Study on the Proofs of God's Existence in Thomas Aquinas. 한국기독교신학논총, 66(1), 97–116.
Copleston, F. C. (2003). Logical positivism and existentialism (Vol. 11). A&C Black.
Craig, W. L. (2004). The cosmological argument. In The rationality of theism (pp. 124–143). Routledge.
Craig, W. L., & Sinclair, J. D. (2009). The Kalam cosmological argument. The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, 101–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444308334.ch3
Dastagiri, M. B. (2018). The Origin of Universe: Big Bang to God Theory. European Scientific Journal, 14(33), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n33p143
Davies, B. (2011). Thinking About God. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Davies, B. (2011). Thomas Aquinas on god and evil. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199790890.001.0001
Davies, B., & Stump, E. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195326093.001.0001
Dodds, M. J. (2020). The One Creator God in Thomas Aquinas and Contemporary Theology. Catholic University of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv131bt1q
Eatough, G. (2016). From Plato’s Cave to Tragic Truth: A theoric journey between theatre and the visual arts. Lancaster University (United Kingdom).
Ellis, G. F. R. (2014). On the philosophy of cosmology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46, 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.07.006
Evans, C. S. (2010). Natural signs and knowledge of God: A new look at theistic arguments. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755621422
Firestone, R. S. (2019). Dismantling Paley’s Watch: Equivocation Regarding the Word “Order” in the Teleological Argument. Open Journal of Philosophy, 10(1), 155–186. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2020.101012
Futuyma, D. J. (2015). Can modern evolutionary theory explain macroevolution? Macroevolution: Explanation, interpretation and evidence, 29-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15045-1_2
Göcke, B. P., & Göcke, B. P. (2014). Concepts of God in Philosophy and Theology. A Theory of the Absolute, 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137412829_9
Gudyma, I. (2023). Theistic Cosmology of Richard Swinburne as a Phenomenon of the Theological Renaissance. European Journal of Science and Theology, 19(3), 73–89.
Haldane, J. (2016). Heythrop, Copleston, and the Jesuit Contribution to Philosophy1. Philosophy, 91(4), 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819116000383
Hartl, P. (2024). Anthropomorphism and Priestly Power: Hume’s Criticism of Popular Religion. In Hume's Minimal Theism and the Supervised Christian Church: A Philosophical and Historical Analysis of the Idea of True Religion (pp. 57–79). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54945-8_4
Hawley, J. F., & Holcomb, K. A. (2005). Foundations of modern cosmology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198530961.001.0001
Hehenkamp, J. B. M. (2015). David Hume's work on the cosmological argument and the argument from design in Dialogues: A systematic exposition (Master's thesis, University of Utrecht).
Hetherington, N. S. (2023). Aristotle's cosmology. In Cosmology (pp. 95–104). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003418047
Hetherington, N. S. (2023). Plato's cosmology. In Cosmology (pp. 79–94). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003418047
Hume, D. (2000). A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. (2016). Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? Journey into Philosophy: An Introduction with Classic and Contemporary Readings, 206.
Kenny, A. (2010). A new history of Western philosophy. Oxford University Press.
King-Farlow, Y., & Christensen, W. N. (2012). Faith and the Life of Reason. Springer Science & Business Media.
Koons, R. C. (2014). God's Existence. In Neo-Aristotelian perspectives in metaphysics (pp. 247–268). Routledge.
Korsgaard, C. M. (2009, November). The activity of reason. In Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association (Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 23-43). American Philosophical Association.
Kraal, A. (2023). The Problem of God in David Hume. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009270243
Kragh, H. (2023). Big bang cosmology. In Cosmology (pp. 371–390). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003418047-32
Loke, A. (2022). The teleological and Kalam cosmological arguments revisited (p. 387). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94403-2
Manson, N. A. (Ed.). (2002). God and design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203398265
Marinescu, R. I. (2021). Plato on Self-Motion in Laws X. Rhizomata, 9(1), 96-122. https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2021-0005
Michael, R. U. S. E., & Ruse, M. (2009). Darwin and design: Does evolution have a purpose? Harvard University Press.
Millican, P. (2016). Hume’s Chief Argument. The Oxford Handbook of Hume, 82–108.
Mitchell, J. A. (2013). From Aristotle’s Four Causes to Aquinas’ Ultimate Causes of Being: Modern Interpretations. Alpha Omega, 16(3), 399–414.
Naddaf, G. (2004). Plato: the creator of natural theology. International Studies in Philosophy, 36(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil20043616
Nah, D. S. (2013). Christian theology and religious pluralism: A critical evaluation of John Hick. The Lutterworth Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1cgf1qd
Oderberg, D. S. (2013). The cosmological argument. In Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion (pp. 401-410). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813010.ch37
O'Gorman, M. (2017). An investigation of the concept of Divine Freedom within the philosophical Theology of St Thomas Aquinas (Master's thesis, Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick).
Oliver, S. (2006). Philosophy, God and motion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203008195
Paasch, J. T. (2016). Aquinas on the Trinity. Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae: A Critical Guide, 68-87.
Pruss, A. R. (2009). The Leibnizian cosmological argument. The Blackwell companion to natural theology, 24–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444308334.ch2
Rheins, J. G. (2010). The intelligible creator-god and the intelligent soul of the cosmos in Plato's theology and metaphysics (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania).
Smith, S. H. (2014). The Problem of God. Xlibris Corporation.
Spoerl, J. S. (2017). Hume's Critique of Natural Religion: A Thomistic Response. Saint Anselm Journal, 13(1).
Stanek, T. B. (2017). On David Hume. Journal of Critical Issues in Educational Practice, 7(1), 3.
Swinburne, R. (2007). The Revival of Natural Theology. Archivio di filosofia: LXXV, 1/2, 2007, 1000-1020.
Swinburne, R. (2010). God as the Simplest Explanation of the Universe. European Journal of Philosophy of Religion, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v2i1.348
Swinburne, R. (2010). The argument to God from the laws of nature. Science and Religion in Dialogue, 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317350.ch14
Swinburne, R. (2010). Is there a God? Oxford University Press.
Tahko, T. E. (2011). A priori and a posteriori: A bootstrapping relationship. Metaphysica, 12(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12133-011-0083-5
Tipler, F. J. (2003). Intelligent life in cosmology. International Journal of Astrobiology, 2(2), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1473550403001526
Tooley, M., & Plantinga, A. (2011). Hume and the Problem of Evil. Philosophy of Religion: The Key Thinkers, 159–86.
van den Heuvel, E. (2016). The Big Bang as Origin of the Universe. In The Amazing Unity of the Universe (pp. 137-160). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23543-1_10
Van Nieuwenhove, R. (2021). Thomas Aquinas and Contemplation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895295.001.0001
Van Nuffelen, P. (2012). Beyond Categorisation: “Pagan Monotheism” And the Study of Ancient Religion. Common Knowledge, 18(3), 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-1630332
Vijgen, J. (2018). The Corruption of the Good of Nature and Moral Action: The Realism of St. Thomas Aquinas. Espíritu: cuadernos del Instituto Filosófico de Balmesiana, 67(155), 127-152.
Warr, A. (2008). Nietzsche on truth (Doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan).
Weingartner, P. (2010). God's Existence. Can it be proven? De Gruyter Brill. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110324624
Weston, P. R. (2018). A Reformed Assessment of Richard Swinburne’s Christian Theology (Doctoral dissertation, London School of Theology).
Wilson, J. (2010). What is Hume’s dictum, and why believe it? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80(3), 595–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00342.x
Zeyl, D. J. (2021). Divine Causal Agency in Classical Greek Philosophy. In Philosophical Essays on Divine Causation (pp. 14–31). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429320767-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Moses Adeleke Adeoye
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
